|
|
 |
|
PEVA Shuffle 2010
Preseason Batting
Power Rankings
1. New York
Yankees
2. Boston Red Sox
3. Minnesota Twins
4. Philadelphia Phillies
5. St. Louis Cardinals
6. Los Angeles Dodgers
7. Tampa Bay Rays
8. New York Mets
9. Colorado Rockies
10. Milwaukee Brewers
11. Washington Nationals
12. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
13. San Diego Padres
14. Atlanta Braves
15. Florida Marlins
16. Baltimore Orioles
17. Seattle Mariners
18. Toronto Blue Jays
19. Houston Astros
20. Detroit Tigers
21. San Francisco Giants
22. Arizona Diamondbacks
23. Kansas City Royals
24. Cleveland Indians
25. Cincinnati Reds
26. Chicago Cubs
27. Chicago White Sox
28. Oakland A's
29. Texas Rangers
30. Pittsburgh Pirates
|
|
 |
|
|
|
PEVA
Shuffle 2010
Preseason Pitching Power Rankings
1. New York Yankees
2. San Francisco Giants
3. St. Louis Cardinals
4. Milwaukee Brewers
5. Seattle Mariners
6. Philadelphia Phillies
7. Detroit Tigers
8. Minnesota Twins
9. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
10. Los Angeles Dodgers
11. Boston Red Sox
12. Colorado Rockies
13. Kansas City Royals
14. Arizona Diamondbacks
15. Tampa Bay Rays
16. Chicago Cubs
17. Atlanta Braves
18. Cincinnati Reds
19. Oakland A's
20. Texas Rangers
21. San Diego Padres
22. Florida Marlins
23. Chicago White Sox
24. Houston Astros
25. Washington Nationals
26. Baltimore Orioles
27. Pittsburgh Pirates
28. Toronto Blue Jays
29. New York Mets
30. Cleveland Indians |
|
Comments
We'd
like to hear from you with your comments or questions.
Send your questions or comments about what you like or don't like about
Stat Geek Baseball and Baseballevaluation.com to
contact@baseballevaluation.com. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Baseball Evaluation
PEVA
Power Ranking - Shuffle Index 2010
|
|
|
PEVA
Shuffle Ranks - Preseason 2010
As
of 3-22-2010
PEVA Shuffle Totals
| Team |
Name |
Batting |
Pitching |
Total |
| Arizona |
Diamondbacks |
67.322 |
67.909 |
135.231 |
| Atlanta |
Braves |
76.145 |
63.308 |
139.453 |
| Baltimore |
Orioles |
74.280 |
44.633 |
118.913 |
| Boston |
Red
Sox |
120.473 |
72.205 |
192.678 |
| Chicago |
White
Sox |
58.546 |
55.321 |
113.867 |
| Chicago |
Cubs |
65.064 |
65.049 |
130.113 |
| Cincinnati |
Reds |
65.191 |
61.365 |
126.556 |
| Cleveland |
Indians |
65.479 |
21.853 |
87.332 |
| Colorado |
Rockies |
91.513 |
68.520 |
160.033 |
| Detroit |
Tigers |
69.722 |
78.947 |
148.668 |
| Florida |
Marlins |
75.610 |
58.373 |
133.983 |
| Houston |
Astros |
70.755 |
53.906 |
124.661 |
| Kansas
City |
Royals |
66.491 |
68.418 |
134.909 |
| Los
Angeles |
Angels
of Anaheim |
83.653 |
76.580 |
160.233 |
| Los
Angeles |
Dodgers |
96.773 |
72.371 |
169.145 |
| Milwaukee |
Brewers |
90.229 |
94.283 |
184.512 |
| Minnesota |
Twins |
119.388 |
78.392 |
197.779 |
| New
York |
Yankees |
127.509 |
117.288 |
244.797 |
| New
York |
Mets |
94.752 |
37.582 |
132.334 |
| Oakland |
A's |
57.237 |
60.452 |
117.689 |
| Philadelphia |
Phillies |
117.850 |
80.723 |
198.573 |
| Pittsburgh |
Pirates |
50.317 |
40.465 |
90.782 |
| San
Diego |
Padres |
77.185 |
58.529 |
135.713 |
| Seattle |
Mariners |
72.828 |
88.799 |
161.628 |
| San
Francisco |
Giants |
69.456 |
100.076 |
169.531 |
| St.
Louis |
Cardinals |
112.600 |
99.273 |
211.873 |
| Tampa
Bay |
Rays |
95.952 |
65.797 |
161.749 |
| Texas |
Rangers |
56.684 |
59.311 |
115.995 |
| Toronto |
Blue
Jays |
71.994 |
38.852 |
110.846 |
| Washington |
Nationals |
86.505 |
48.082 |
134.586 |
Note: PEVA Shuffle Totals include PEVA 2009 totals for all players on
40 man preseason 2010 roster, plus other organization players who
played in 2009, as of date
|
|
|
PEVA Shuffle Plus
Minus (Compared to Final 2009)
| Team |
Name |
Total |
Batting
+/- |
Pitching
+/- |
Total
+/- |
| Arizona |
Diamondbacks |
135.231 |
5.521 |
-13.270 |
-7.749 |
| Atlanta |
Braves |
139.453 |
-8.716 |
-40.576 |
-49.292 |
| Baltimore |
Orioles |
118.913 |
1.494 |
7.207 |
8.701 |
| Boston |
Red
Sox |
192.678 |
17.336 |
-3.194 |
14.142 |
| Chicago |
White
Sox |
113.867 |
-2.569 |
-11.033 |
-13.602 |
| Chicago |
Cubs |
130.113 |
0.780 |
-8.318 |
-7.538 |
| Cincinnati |
Reds |
126.556 |
6.359 |
-3.888 |
2.471 |
| Cleveland |
Indians |
87.332 |
-20.403 |
-20.941 |
-41.344 |
| Colorado |
Rockies |
160.033 |
5.952 |
-15.063 |
-9.111 |
| Detroit |
Tigers |
148.668 |
-11.143 |
-0.747 |
-11.891 |
| Florida |
Marlins |
133.983 |
-10.495 |
-11.472 |
-21.967 |
| Houston |
Astros |
124.661 |
-8.916 |
-6.708 |
-15.624 |
| Kansas
City |
Royals |
134.909 |
1.398 |
-4.741 |
-3.343 |
| Los
Angeles |
Angels
of Anaheim |
160.233 |
-14.550 |
12.387 |
-2.163 |
| Los
Angeles |
Dodgers |
169.145 |
-11.993 |
-17.571 |
-29.563 |
| Milwaukee |
Brewers |
184.512 |
-22.295 |
31.414 |
9.119 |
| Minnesota |
Twins |
197.779 |
10.223 |
11.143 |
21.365 |
| New
York |
Yankees |
244.797 |
-5.935 |
29.070 |
23.135 |
| New
York |
Mets |
132.334 |
26.501 |
-11.192 |
15.309 |
| Oakland |
A's |
117.689 |
-14.377 |
-3.986 |
-18.363 |
| Philadelphia |
Phillies |
198.573 |
3.816 |
15.343 |
19.159 |
| Pittsburgh |
Pirates |
90.782 |
-14.851 |
-4.475 |
-19.326 |
| San
Diego |
Padres |
135.713 |
-8.724 |
3.244 |
-5.481 |
| Seattle |
Mariners |
161.628 |
11.809 |
10.915 |
22.725 |
| San
Francisco |
Giants |
169.531 |
8.286 |
-12.327 |
-4.042 |
| St.
Louis |
Cardinals |
211.873 |
8.005 |
-19.497 |
-11.492 |
| Tampa
Bay |
Rays |
161.749 |
-2.322 |
7.524 |
5.202 |
| Texas |
Rangers |
115.995 |
-14.513 |
-5.816 |
-20.329 |
| Toronto |
Blue
Jays |
110.846 |
-30.553 |
-28.482 |
-59.035 |
| Washington |
Nationals |
134.586 |
-1.356 |
12.413 |
11.056 |
Note:
PEVA Shuffle Plus Minus numbers represent the increase or decrease
between the totals for the Preseason 2010 roster versus the
end of season totals of 2009. |
PEVA Shuffle Index - Batting
Power Rankings
March
24, 2010 - Just what we all needed, but it's certainly
possible,
when you look at all the additions and subtractions of the offseason
Hot Stove league that the Yankees made themselves better. And
they probably did. Then travel across the country to the Pacific
Northwest and you'll find a squad that's going to make a whole lot of
inroads toward a championship considering their offseason moves, the
Seattle Mariners. It's going to be an interesting season,
with
some new clubs contending for those postseason spots and a whole lot of
same ole with the big clubs. And it's going to start only ten
days from now. Hold onto those hats!
Who
has done the best in the PEVA Shuffle for batters here in the waning
days of preseason.
Top Five
1. New York Mets - How about those Mets? Now, those
batting
additions, plus a return to health by the returning players, is going
to have to do a whole lot of pounding considering the pitching staff
beyond a few notables, but it is those Mets who made the biggest PEVA
splash between the end of last season and the beginning of this one.
And yes, it starts with the addition of Jason Bay.
For some
reason, Bay is not as highly regarded for his accomplishments as he
should. This is likely because he played all those years for
the
Pirates with only one high profile season in 2009 with the Red Sox, but
his veteran and consistent presence in the middle of the Mets lineup
will only make those around him; Reyes, Beltran, Wright, and Delgado
better. 36 HR and 119 RBI can do it for you, even though
those
numbers are likely to drop when going from Fenway to Citi Field.
All in all, his addition, as well as the smaller moves like a
full season of Franceour, could add up to 13 wins to their total from
the batting side. Although the offseason from the mound
equation
could negate most of those gains.
2. Boston Red Sox - Now you wouldn't think that the squad
that
lost the major player from above would be able to slide in as #2 with
their replacements, but that's just what they did. With a
full
season of Victor Martinez and additions such as Marco Scutaro at
shortstop, Mike Cameron in the outfield, Adrian Beltre, and Bill Hall,
the revamped lineup of the Sox could be worth as much as 8 to 9
additional wins. Will that be enough to overtake the Yankees,
...
we doubt it, but it should put Boston back into the playoff mix.
3. Seattle Mariners - There's a good feeling going on in
Mariner
land as Seattle did a good job in the offseason addressing both its
pitching and batting woes. The top of the lineup with Chone
Figgins next to Ichiro is a go go recipe in a park where manufacturing
runs is at a premium. His speed ought to add a lot to that
equation. There's probably not enough thunder below them, but
nice additions to the mix in Casey Kotchman, Ryan Garko, and Jack
Wilson (even though he was overpaid) should add depth to a lineup that
needed it. Oh, and then there's Milton Bradley.
Never sure
whether you're going to get the positive baseball player of the nut
job, so it's always a gamble, but overall, the additions to the lineup,
combined with those on the mound, should add up to fun and wins in
Seattle in 2010.
4. Minnesota Twins - With Joe Nathan going down, it's gonna
take
the offense to give them better leads, and the additions of Orlando
Hudson and Jim Thome should help in that end. We're not
talking
about a sea change in offensive output; they were already good.
Additional 10 PEVA in the Shuffle.
5. San Francisco Giants - They've been looking for punch
since a
Bonds left the building and we're not talking about a batting
juggernaut even now, bu the nice plus players of Mark DeRosa, Aubrey
Huff, and a full year of Freddy Sanchez, should add a few more runs to
the bottom line. And a few more is all this great pitching
staff
might need.
Bottom Five
26. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim - Chone Figgins and
Vladimir
Guerrero is really all that's needed to be said. Yes, Hideki
Matsui was a nice addition, but he's not Chone Figgins and Vladimir
Guerrero.
27. Pittsburgh Pirates - One of these days you have to go
from
rebuilding to having the house be done. This is not that
year.
Down 14.851 Batting Points.
28. Cleveland Indians - It's really a shame to think of where
the
Indians were and where they are today. Even more of a shame
on
the pitching side, but when you lose a catcher of the significance of
Victor Martinez, it's not good here either. A loss of over 20
Batting PEVA between the end of 2009 and today.
29. Milwaukee Brewers - They gave up on a few players over
the
winter who did not succeed as much as they'd hope with the bat, and
focused on pitching additions. There's still enough at the
plate
here though, and we're predicting a pretty good year in Brewer nation.
30. Toronto Blue Jays - They're shedding talent on both sides
of
the ball like a dog sheds winter fur in the cold Canadian north.
So despite the presence of good young talent like Aaron Hill
and
Adam Lind, it's gonna be a long year north of the border.
PEVA Shuffle Index - Pitching
Power Rankings
March
24, 2010 - There have been a lot of changes and more than a few teams
have made
their case for better pitching staffs. So just what was
really up
with jettisoning Cliff Lee for Roy Halladay and did that make the
Phillies staff that much better? The ups and downs of
the PEVA Shuffle Index show just where the table will start to be set
once the real games begin. This index is not a projection,
folks, but it is based on the only thing we know for now. If
the year 2010 has player performance like 2009, where do we stand today.
Who has done the best in the PEVA Shuffle for pitchers.
Top Five
1. Milwaukee Brewers - It may not be as sexy to think of
adding
Randy Wolf to the staff as making a huge leap in the pitching
department, but when healthy, Wolf at least begins to make up for
previous losses. When you throw in nice pitchers such as Doug
Davis and LaTroy Hawkins and the hope for strides from the youngsters,
the Brewers might have just enough pitching to make a pretty big splash
in 2010.
2. New York Yankees - Just what the world of baseball beyond
the
Bronx needed, more pitching for the juggernaut batting Yankees.
We know he didn't fare too well there before and might not
again,
but if Javier Vazquez pitches anywhere near how well he did last year
in Atlanta, Katy, don't just bar that door, cement it shut.
The
addition of Vazquez could be worth a good amount of
additional
wins.
3. Philadelphia Phillies - We still think it's odd that they
bothered to make the swap of Cliff Lee for Roy Halladay, even though we
acknowledge that Halladay has been better for long, but the real change
here is that one of those pitchers is going to be available for the
entire year on this staff. Upgrade of 15.343 in Pitching
PEVA,
which could add up to an additional 7 wins or so. Now if
somebody
could just explain their bullpen if Brad Lidge does not rebound.
4. Washington Nationals - There was nowhere to go but up, and
even without counting on the Strasburg effect in 2010, they should
pitching significantly better in 2010 than 2009 with the addition of
Jason Marquis, and castoffs such as Tyler Walker, Logan
Kensing,
and Sean Burnett added to the mix for a full season.
5. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim - You wouldn't think you
could
lose your best pitcher in John Lackey and make gains, but the Angels
should be better on the mound in 2010 with the arms of Joel Pineiro and
Scott Kazmir in the rotation. Now, that's counting on alot of
Pineiro repeating his best season of last year, and he might not be
able to accomplish that, but on paper, it looks better. They
also
added Fernando Rodney to the pen and paid him a lot of money, too much
money, to help. He might help, but not as much as folks
think, in
our opinion,.
Bottom Five
26. Los Angeles Dodgers - They keep counting on the young
guns of
a plus farm system to take up the slack and some year the Kershaw's of
the world will do just that. But they really didn't replace
the
veteran arms of Randy Wolf this offseason and I'm not too sure what
you'll get in Vincente Padilla and his amalgam of talent and
inconsistency.
27. St. Louis Cardinals - Their pitching staff is still
really
good, but they did lose one of the three studs in Pineiro from 2009,
and this will cost them in some way. Down 19.497 PEVA from
the
end of the season till now.
28. Cleveland Indians - Yes, it's a shame. When you
lose
two Cy Young Award winners in successive seasons, it's bound to happen.
Some of those youngers better grow up fast or you might not
see a
whole lot of wins along the shores of Cleveland this season.
29. Toronto Blue Jays - One less Halladay says it all.
30. Atlanta Braves - They think they have enough with Tommy
Hanson and the other young guns and maybe they do, but the loss of
Javier Vazquez in going to be felt until those arms mature into
consistent winners. A loss of 40.576 PEVA on the pitching mound from
the end of the season in 2009 to the beginning of the season in 2010.
For a list of the PEVA Shuffle Index - Pitcher Power Rankings, see the
left column.
|
Baseball
Evaluation Scoreboard |
| Team |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
R |
H |
E |
| Pitchers |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
- |
7 |
12 |
1 |
| Hitters |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
- |
7 |
12 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Search
|
 |
Baseball
Evaluation and all materials on this site are the 2009 Copyright and
intellectual property of JDP ECON and their licensors. All
worldwide rights reserved. The Baseball Evaluation system was
developed independently of Major League Baseball and the Major League
Baseball Players Association and is not endorsed by or associated in
any way with either organization.
Note:
All Baseball Evaluation Stats were developed by JDP Econ & are
the
proprietary property of JDP ECON. All rights reserved. If Baseball
Evaluation stats are used in articles, etc., please credit
baseballevalution.com. |
|
|